S700i : any opinions yet ?
Posts: n/a before and got rid of it because of the bulky size. The rest of the specs of the S700i are ok with me. -- "and hey...let's be careful out there" David May Last edited by ankurmva : 10-24-2008 at 12:58 PM.  Responses to "S700i : any opinions yet ?"
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a Re: S700i : any opinions yet ? John Navas wrote:> in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big > screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera: Heh. Considering there is no way to protect the display from errant touches, I don't think that's such a bad thing that it doesn't have a touch screen! > I personally see little merit to a mediocre camera in a phone -- I'd rather > carry a good small digital camera (e.g., Sony DSC-P8), with some of > connectivity to my phone (Bluetooth and/or Memory Stick). With a strong > position in both product areas, but no integration, I think Sony is missing a > good opportunity. This is why my Nikon E5700 is always in my bag if I want to take pictures. I do use the camera now and then though on my K700 and 6600. It's just a matter of how badly I need the image. I use my on-handset camera most often at work, capturing whiteboards!
Posts: n/a Re: S700i : any opinions yet ? [POSTED TO alt.cellular.ericsson - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]In <m9dUc.28033$Bb.16689@lakeread08> on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:26:43 -0400, incumbent <incumbent@gmail.com> wrote: >John Navas wrote: > >> in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big >> screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera: > >Heh. > >Considering there is no way to protect the display from errant touches, >I don't think that's such a bad thing that it doesn't have a touch screen! It could be locked, just like the P800/900 with flip removed. -- Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES: John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
Posts: n/a Re: S700i : any opinions yet ? John Navas wrote:> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.ericsson - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE] > > In <m9dUc.28033$Bb.16689@lakeread08> on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:26:43 -0400, > incumbent <incumbent@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>John Navas wrote: >> >> >>>in) and heavy (heavier than the Z600), and I think it's a shame that the big >>>screen isn't touch sensitive. Review, mostly of the camera: >> >>Heh. >> >>Considering there is no way to protect the display from errant touches, >>I don't think that's such a bad thing that it doesn't have a touch screen! > > > It could be locked, just like the P800/900 with flip removed. > Yeah, I suppose that's true. I never liked having the flip off on my P900 though. But it was the only way it'd fit into a Vaja case. Boo! Though if SE made the UI more "finger friendly" and didn't require a stylus, that would be pretty slick on a device like the S700.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Linear Mode
