6600 bluetooth, class 1 or class 2?

Quoth The Raven "Andy" <af@inet.hr> in
ch4hsg$pd$1@sunce.iskon.hr
> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money buying a
> 100m dongle, every dongle is the same, but look for the driver
> software to be Widcomm's

thanks, have you got a brand recommendation, most sale sites don't talk
about the driver details

--
This will shut down Windows, do you want to play another game ?

Take out the _CURSEING to reply to me

Andy wrote:

> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money buying a 100m
> dongle, every dongle is the same, but look for the driver software to be
> Widcomm's
>

I wouldn't bet my month's salary, but I would say you are not right. If
the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a signal up to 100m,
and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone is able to do send/receive
in a 10m range, that means in extreme situation, the dongle and phone
separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to communicate. I
agree the signal will be very low, but still there.

--
JScoobyCed
What about a JScooby snack Shaggy ? ... Shaggy ?!

I am not 100% sure cause I haven't tried , but heard from people that know a
bit more than me on cellulars an their bt that it is not possible. If it
was, it could be a nice way to send sms and files free to all cell phones in
your neighbourhood, don't you think, and this is not in operator's interest.
Anyway, regarding the brand of the dongle, I wouldn't know which to suggest,
I have a no name, but the software is Widcomm's and it works.

"JScoobyCed" <pim@pam.poum> wrote in message
news:41368a7d$0$28825$636a15ce@news.free.fr...
> Andy wrote:
>
> > Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money buying a
100m
> > dongle, every dongle is the same, but look for the driver software to be
> > Widcomm's
> >
>
> I wouldn't bet my month's salary, but I would say you are not right. If
> the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a signal up to 100m,
> and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone is able to do send/receive
> in a 10m range, that means in extreme situation, the dongle and phone
> separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to communicate. I
> agree the signal will be very low, but still there.
>
> --
> JScoobyCed
> What about a JScooby snack Shaggy ? ... Shaggy ?!

JScoobyCed <pim@pam.poum> wrote in
news:41368a7d$0$28825$636a15ce@news.free.fr:

> Andy wrote:
>
>> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money
>> buying a 100m dongle
>
> If the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a
> signal up to 100m, and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone
> is able to do send/receive in a 10m range, the dongle and phone
> separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to
> communicate.

I don't think this is right. I believe the difference is in
transmit strength only. This means that both ends have to be in the
100m range class to give the extended range.

At this point I don't know, the best is to try someone else's and to see

"John Carlyle-Clarke" <john.cc@nospam.europlacer.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns95585FA1F4B09johncceuroplacercouk@192.168. 1.69...
> JScoobyCed <pim@pam.poum> wrote in
> news:41368a7d$0$28825$636a15ce@news.free.fr:
>
> > Andy wrote:
> >
> >> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money
> >> buying a 100m dongle
> >
> > If the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a
> > signal up to 100m, and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone
> > is able to do send/receive in a 10m range, the dongle and phone
> > separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to
> > communicate.
>
> I don't think this is right. I believe the difference is in
> transmit strength only. This means that both ends have to be in the
> 100m range class to give the extended range.
>
>

"Andy" <af@inet.hr> schreef in bericht news:ch6q9r$h8g$1@sunce.iskon.hr...
> At this point I don't know, the best is to try someone else's and to see
>
I have a 10m and a 100m dongle from Sitecom. The 100m dongle as an antenna
(!) at the outside and has a much better range.



> "John Carlyle-Clarke" <john.cc@nospam.europlacer.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:Xns95585FA1F4B09johncceuroplacercouk@192.168. 1.69...
> > JScoobyCed <pim@pam.poum> wrote in
> > news:41368a7d$0$28825$636a15ce@news.free.fr:
> >
> > > Andy wrote:
> > >
> > >> Mobile phone supports bt up to 10m, so it's a waste of money
> > >> buying a 100m dongle
> > >
> > > If the dongle supports 100m, that means it can send a
> > > signal up to 100m, and read a signal which is 100m. If the phone
> > > is able to do send/receive in a 10m range, the dongle and phone
> > > separated by at most 110m distance will still be able to
> > > communicate.
> >
> > I don't think this is right. I believe the difference is in
> > transmit strength only. This means that both ends have to be in the
> > 100m range class to give the extended range.
> >
> >
>
>