In article <p8cktv0q68n66ihqg8kjvru4q4bvet2q0m@4ax.com>,
W.S. Blevins <wblev@remove_this_hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:17:25 GMT, David <dlandsdowne@wsys.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bingo. If one looks at a true SprintPCS coverage map, it's cities, and
> >interstates to 50 miles out of town, looks like a mess of spiders.
>
>
> It's definitely for those who live in larger cities and use major
> highways.

Major highways close in to the major cities. If you ever travel across
country (i.e. I-10 you have zero coverage more often than you have
coverage).





> For those like me who fit that profile, it's an excellent
> value.

David <dlandsdowne@wsys.net> wrote in news:dlandsdowne-
4AE1BA.15172512122003@news02.west.earthlink.net:

> In article <jl9ktv0lot31buhguitccm88d7k3fs73vq@4ax.com>,
> W.S. Blevins <wblev@remove_this_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:03:21 GMT, David <dlandsdowne@wsys.net> wrote:
>>
>> >You must live across the street from a tower and never travel out of
>> >state or on a rural road.
>>
>>
I have been with Sprint for 6 years and have never dropped a call. In fact
I have never roamed. I have drivuin as far as Texas from Los Angeles and as
far as I can tell I had coverage

In article <Xns944FA61067EC4paulwnospamcom@129.250.170.85>,
Ski <ski@nospam.com> wrote:

> David <dlandsdowne@wsys.net> wrote in news:dlandsdowne-
> 4AE1BA.15172512122003@news02.west.earthlink.net:
>
> > In article <jl9ktv0lot31buhguitccm88d7k3fs73vq@4ax.com>,
> > W.S. Blevins <wblev@remove_this_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:03:21 GMT, David <dlandsdowne@wsys.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >You must live across the street from a tower and never travel out of
> >> >state or on a rural road.
> >>
> >>
> I have been with Sprint for 6 years and have never dropped a call. In fact
> I have never roamed. I have drivuin as far as Texas from Los Angeles and as
> far as I can tell I had coverage


Well you didn't. Their map shows 75% of the area (along I-10) without
coverage, (Los Angeles to Texas) more if you went past El Paso, and more
if you didn't stay on I-10..

"David" <dlandsdowne@wsys.net> wrote in message
news:dlandsdowne-763A77.18530212122003@news02.west.earthlink.net...

>
>
> Well you didn't. Their map shows 75% of the area (along I-10) without
> coverage, (Los Angeles to Texas) more if you went past El Paso, and more
> if you didn't stay on I-10..

But Phil- you have said on many ocassions that the maps are crap. Now you
are using them to make a point. Which is it?

You should try Nokia