does the razr contain a gps receiver?
if so, can the casual user manipulate it at all, can
you display your current location?
can you disable the gps entirely?
> does the razr contain a gps receiver?
> if so, can the casual user manipulate it at all, can
> you display your current location?
> can you disable the gps entirely?
BruceR
columbotrek
Posts: n/a
Re: gps
Posted: 01-31-2006, 05:25 PM
clamstrip fecadunker wrote:
> does the razr contain a gps receiver?
> if so, can the casual user manipulate it at all, can
> you display your current location?
> can you disable the gps entirely?
>
If it has E911 it has a GPS in it. Wether or not you can access it for
other purposes depends on the phones software features. Might I suggest
you read the book. My i560 does allow access to the GPS. E911 enables
the GPS when you call 911 and that can not be disabled. If that worries
you, lookup the non-911 phone numbers for the various public service
dispatchers and program them in the phones memory.
columbotrek
John Navas
Posts: n/a
Re: gps
Posted: 01-31-2006, 06:11 PM
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <w4NDf.34$aN2.17721@okeanos.csu.net> on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:25:48 -0800,
columbotrek <columbotrek@yahoo.NoSapm.com> wrote:
>clamstrip fecadunker wrote:
>> does the razr contain a gps receiver?
>> if so, can the casual user manipulate it at all, can
>> you display your current location?
>> can you disable the gps entirely?
>>
>If it has E911 it has a GPS in it. ...
Not necessarily. GSM carriers in the USA are using non-GPS technology for
E911.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
John Navas
columbotrek
Posts: n/a
Re: gps
Posted: 02-06-2006, 07:23 PM
John Navas wrote:
>>If it has E911 it has a GPS in it. ...
>
>
> Not necessarily. GSM carriers in the USA are using non-GPS technology for
> E911.
>
The only other way I know of to acquire position then is to triangulate
from various towers. Which only works if one is in range of more than
1. A vector and signal strength from one site is a poor substitute as
it must assume way to much. From what I have read on the topic, E911
(in my handset at least) uses a combination of tower and GPS data. I do
have access to the GPS and can call up a simple log/lat without any
additional software.
columbotrek
John Navas
Posts: n/a
Re: gps
Posted: 02-06-2006, 10:17 PM
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.motorola - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <EmNFf.44$aN2.18731@okeanos.csu.net> on Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:23:15 -0800,
columbotrek <columbotrek@yahoo.NoSapm.com> wrote:
>John Navas wrote:
>>>If it has E911 it has a GPS in it. ...
>>
>> Not necessarily. GSM carriers in the USA are using non-GPS technology for
>> E911.
>
>The only other way I know of to acquire position then is to triangulate
>from various towers. Which only works if one is in range of more than
>1. A vector and signal strength from one site is a poor substitute as
>it must assume way to much. From what I have read on the topic, E911
>(in my handset at least) uses a combination of tower and GPS data. I do
>have access to the GPS and can call up a simple log/lat without any
>additional software.
CMDA handsets do use a form of GPS (Assisted GPS). GSM handsets do not.
See E-911 in the FAQ below.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>