Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES

Posted: 01-05-2005, 05:55 PM
Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS ON CINGULAR BILLING DISPUTES

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_...r_billing.html

Carolyn of Mullins SC (1/28/03):
We purchased a nationwide plan knowing we were going on an extended
vacation to California and needed to keep in touch with family here. We
were told we had nights and weekends free up to 3500 minutes. We
received no written proof of this transaction, and called twice to be
sure we had the free minutes and were told we did. We didn't have it in
writing, so when our bill came when we returned, we were furuous when
told we were charged for roaming charges to the amount of $2000. I
think the employees of this company should be trained to know what they
are selling. We also had a friend that traveled to alaska and believing
they had free minutes were charged for the calls. they got half of
their money back, we got none.


We were out a lot of money, all they said was sorry, your minutes only
count when in S.C. Now the phone is worthless, but will keep it until
our contract is up as they charged us $150 to turn in the other phone.
i am afraid to use the phone long distance at all now, and plan to turn
it in when the contract is up and not get another one.


Tamie of Wilsonville AL (10/3/02):
I have been overcharged every month since February, and paid the bills,
averaging $220+ for one phone. I even upped my minutes to 1000/mo for
$69.99 and just got my bill -- $188.65 for under 600 minutes! I cannot
afford these bills. Every month I think it will be straightened out.
Everyone I talk to has similar problems.


Paige of Noblesville IN writes (7/23/01):
I was not told about roaming charges at all when I signed up for free
long distance..the company finally agreed to eliminate the roaming
charges but now want to charge me for any overage ... taking away one
charge but adding another!

I am extremely upset with their desceptive practices, I cannot trust
them...the rep would not send me their new terms in writing until I
agreed to them first! I was duped and tricked!



Angela of Jacksonville FL (1/14/03):
I signed up for a 250 anytime minute plan plus 3,500 nights/weekends
with no roaming or long distance. I have been using Cingular since
1996, not always on this plan. The last time I changed my plan, it was
to cost me $29.99 per month for a gross bill of $38.00. My monthly
bills have ranged anywhere from $45 to $198 with Cingular, which is a
far cry from the $38.00 per month that I always anticipate.


Since June 2001, I have only paid the minimum $38.00 7 times. I became
concerned at the amount of the monthly bills. Therefore, I began
attempting to track my usage. However, as usual, the total minutes
billed did not match my estimates. I was reading on the Internet some
fine print about being charged airtime for checking your voicemail. In
addition, when I requested the National plan, I did not sign a
contract, therefore I was not aware of the $.40 per minute peak
overlimit charge. I thought I was supposed to be paying around $.19 per
minute or less. I have asked for detailed billing, but it still does
not clarify all of the charges. I am concerned that Cingular is
engaging in illegal billing activity. As a consumer, I would hope that
someone is reviewing the billing practices of cell phone companies.


Colleen of Syracuse NY (1/4/03):
I signed up for a cell phone for my daughter for X-Mas in 2001. I
signed up for the $19.99 a month plan with free nights and weekends. I
was told that if I needed to up the plan to more minutes I could and I
could also go back to the $19.99 plan anytime. I was planning a trip
and knew I would need more minutes so changed the plan for one month.
After the one month I called and changed the plan back to the original
$19.99 a month plan. Each plan had free nights and weekends. After
switching back to the $19.99 a month plan I received a bill for $600
for like 2000 airtime minutes!


I immediately called the company and was told that yes I owed this
amount because when I changed plans my free nights and weekends were no
longer included. Well, I tried to talk to a manager but was put on hold
for 20 minutes or more at a time. Each time I would talk to someone
their story would change. I would ask to speak to the person I had
already spoken to and would be told that person had gone home even
though I had spoken with them 20 minutes earlier! It was very
frustrating and I finally told them to shut the damn phone off and I
would not pay anything! I lost my temper because I could not speak to
anyone with any authority nor could I get a straight answer from
anyone! Very frustrating!


The account has been turned over to a collection agency and every bill
that comes is of course higher than the last. I think the last bill I
received was for $800. I don't know what to do. I can not afford an
attorney nor will I pay $800. I feel totally ripped off! The
consequences are that my credit is being jepordized by a company that
is taking advantage of people! I really want my daughter to have a cell
phone in case of an emergency but I refuse to be taken advantage of and
pay a bogus $800 bill.


Colleen is making a big mistake. She should pay the bill, then sue the
company in Small Claims Court to recover her payments and costs. Her
present course leads only to more trouble.


Lisa of Gravette AR (9/12/02):
I had 4 phones with Cingular Wireless. We all lived in the state of
Arkansas and could talk unlimited to each other. This was great for
about 12 months into my contract. My first bill they sent me that was
incorrect was for $2600. I was very upset. I called, was on hold for at
least one hour. I then was told they would have to send it to a
auditing department. They told me it would take 10 days to resolve the
problem. The next phone bill was only $1600.00. I normally have $100.00
phone bills. This continues for 5 months. I was overcharged in the end
$280.00. I knew I had to pay it because they would send it to
collections. I didn't feel I could go to an attorney and that cost me
more. I found this web site and decided to least warn people of this
company. They were rude and not caring at all with my situation.


Hours on the phone was the most upsetting. I now know what they mean
about going "postal" I threw my phone across my yard after being on
hold for one hour and finally getting someone, telling them my problem
and then I lost the signal. The feeling that I had no control over the
situation that I was just waiting for them to tell me how much I owed
them. I was able to get out of my contract without paying a penalty.


Deborah of Nashua NJ (6/14/01):
I have a nationwide calling plan with Cingular Wireless (Digital Edge
USA) with 550 prepaid minutes/month at a flat rate of $70, no roaming
or long distance anytime, and the calls can be placed from anywhere to
anywhere in the US.

Cingular applies minutes that I incur outside of their "local" coverage
area (i.e., roamer minutes) to the following month's bill, on the
premise that these calls don't show up in their system right away, as
they are from other carriers. Cingular does not adjust the current
month for any unused minutes in the month in which the calls were
ACTUALLY MADE. As such, I get double-billed for these minutes; once in
the unused pre-paid minutes for the month in which the calls were
placed, and then again when the calls show up in the following month.


This practice causes my airtime for the next period to exceed my limit
of 550 minutes, resulting in additional fees and taxes over and above
the pre-paid charge. This practice also leaves the consumer completely
in the dark regarding how many minutes to expect on their monthly bill
.... my cellular telephone only tracks calls in real-time, when they are
actually made, not when they might show up on my Cingular bill.


It seems to me that Cingular should be going back and retroactively
applying roamer minutes to any unused time from the month in which the
calls were ACTUALLY PLACED, rather than billing them against a period
in which they did not occur, and do not pertain to. I have complained
about this practice to Cingular's customer service department with no
satisfaction (I was treated rudely and laughed at by their
representative, Ms. Kara Hannah, for making the suggestion).


It has been pointed out to me that this was disclosed in the agreement
that I signed when I entered into the contract with Cingular, and as
such, it is legal for them to perpetrate this billing practice on their
customers. However, in my opinion, even though it may be legal, that
doesn't make it ethical or right. Is there any logical reason why a
reasonable comsumer should have to accept this type of billing
practice?


My cell phone bills for the last two months, and on one other, prior
occasion, have been between $100-140, when they should have been about
$75.


Jasmine of Los Angeles (6/4/01):
My Supervisor and I went to Cingular to inquire about opening a new
account. We had two problems with the process. First, we inquired about
a business account. We explained that we had very specific needs, as we
travel a lot and conduct a great deal of business on the phone from all
over the country. The representative shared that Cingular had the
perfect phone to fit our needs. It was not and we had to battle with
them to exchange the phone without charging although the representative
lied about the functions this phone had.

In addition, when we initially made the purchase, the Associate
explained that Cingular offered flexible plans to fit our specific
needs. He went on to advise us that we should select the Local plan for
home and switch to a national plan when we travelled. We decided to do
this as he emphasized repeatedly the fact that this was a simple and
cost effective process. Moreover he assured us that there were no
hidden fees if we chose to switch the plan.


Two months later after trying to switch the plans the way we'd been
told we could do, we were advised against this action because of the
fees that would accrue for roaming charges if the cycle had not been
completed. I tried to inquire regarding the matter to see if another
plan may fit our needs but to no avail. I explained that we wished to
cancel the service as the terms of the contract had been totally
misrepresented and falsified. Cingular Wireless agreed to cancel the
contract but insists on us paying the $150.00 fee, which we feel is
completely unfair.


We refuse to pay the fee as the Sales Associate who sold us the
contract was new on the job (only a few days with the company) which I
was told by the Manager early on after an earlier descrepincy with the
phone. We have had the service for two months and have had nothing but
problems from PacBell.


Kelly of California MO (2/8/01):
Once again I've spent nearly TWO HOURS on the phone trying to
straighten out my cell phone bill. We purchased this phone in St.
Joseph Missouri for use by our son in St. Joseph, in our hometown
(California Missouri), and all points in between. We purchased the
phone and service with Southwestern Bell Wireless (now Cingular) after
careful research. We were assured time and time again during the
purchasing process that use of this phone in St. Joseph, in our
hometown, and all points in between WOULD NOT result in roaming charges
or toll charges.

However, each and every month since purchasing this phone we have
either had to call the Cingular office or go to the retail store to
straighten out billing problems. We have been and continue to be billed
roaming and toll charges even though we were ASSURED usage in the areas
described WOULD NOT result in these charges. Granted, each month the
charges have been removed and the customer service rep has promised the
problem has been fixed (after I spent hours on the phone), but we
continue to have problems.


When I have to spend TWO HOURS on the phone trying to fix a problem
that has been ongoing since July 2000, something is seriously wrong. I
called the customer service office at 4 pm CST on Jan. 25, 2001, and
spoke with Frank. After he checked things over and over again for over
45 minutes, I grew tired of waiting and finally asked to speak with a
supervisor. Frank flatly refused to allow me speak with a supervisor! I
was forced to hang up and call back immediately. I then finally spoke
with a supervisor named Gary who saw the problem and promised to fix it
and call me back with the correct billing amount. I waited over an hour
to hear from him (after he promised to call back in 5 or 10 minutes)
and finally had to leave for a meeting that I was already late for. He
finally called an hour and a half later and left a message on my
answering machine that he would call the next day (1/26) but he never
called back.


To say that I find this type of treatment unacceptable would be an
understatement! The time and effort I have been forced to put into
trying to correct something I'm not even at fault for is ridiculous! I
have contacted Cingular through their website (email) at least six
times and called their office several times, only to be put on hold.
Nothing I have done has helped! They WILL NOT contact me regarding this
billing dispute!


Jim P wrote:
> Well, I got my new phones that I ordered on-line from Cingular on the

27th
> of Dec.
> Everything seemed ok until my phone would not accept the sim card.
> (Unauthorized sim) That one had one of my old numbers from Sprint

that was
> being ported over to my new phone. It took 4 days to finally fix the

problem
> and after several hours of talking to tech support. I look online

today at
> my account and there is my first bill for $266.00
> After a very unsatisfying conversation with a rude rep, I find that

they
> have charged me for numerous things that were
> not explained to me in any way, shape or form. I purchased the family


> plan1250 with 4 free phones, so I was thinking my first bill was

going to be
> about $150'ish. Boy was I wrong.
> Is this going to be typical from Cingular? I was a long-time Sprint
> customer, and in a way, I am regretting leaving.


Reply With Quote

Responses to "Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES"

bryan_adrian@yahoo.com
bryan_adrian@yahoo.com's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-05-2005, 06:09 PM
Sorry, Mistyped. It should say:

'TONS OF CONSUMERS INTENTIONALLY BILKED by CINGULAR-AT&T' ........

....and the Cingular and AT&T drubbing of consumers continues without
old fashioned customer services that honor their service agreements.

Cingular does have very good electronic and technical and transmission
assets and performance. It is the business side and marketing side and
billing side that is on the same team as Slobodan Milosevic.

Reply With Quote
John Navas
John Navas's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-05-2005, 08:06 PM
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <1104948562.621674.73570@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com> on 5 Jan 2005
10:09:22 -0800, bryan_adrian@yahoo.com wrote:

>[SNIP]


Enough is enough. You've made your point, now move on. Posting the same crap
over and over just annoys your audience and weakens your case.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
Reply With Quote
helpster
helpster's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-05-2005, 09:35 PM
Whats this got to do with NEXTEL , VERIZON Motorola or Ericsson?. We dislike
excessive cross posting more then you dislike Cingular. It is pointless and
wasteful And if I wanted to read the reports from Consumeraffairs, I can
certainly go there myself without wasting valuable bandwith on here.


<bryan_adrian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104947711.823859.141450@c13g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS ON CINGULAR BILLING DISPUTES
>
> http://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_...r_billing.html
>
> Carolyn of Mullins SC (1/28/03):
> We purchased a nationwide plan knowing we were going on an extended
> vacation to California and needed to keep in touch with family here. We
> were told we had nights and weekends free up to 3500 minutes. We
> received no written proof of this transaction, and called twice to be
> sure we had the free minutes and were told we did. We didn't have it in
> writing, so when our bill came when we returned, we were furuous when
> told we were charged for roaming charges to the amount of $2000. I
> think the employees of this company should be trained to know what they
> are selling. We also had a friend that traveled to alaska and believing
> they had free minutes were charged for the calls. they got half of
> their money back, we got none.
>
>
> We were out a lot of money, all they said was sorry, your minutes only
> count when in S.C. Now the phone is worthless, but will keep it until
> our contract is up as they charged us $150 to turn in the other phone.
> i am afraid to use the phone long distance at all now, and plan to turn
> it in when the contract is up and not get another one.
>
>
> Tamie of Wilsonville AL (10/3/02):
> I have been overcharged every month since February, and paid the bills,
> averaging $220+ for one phone. I even upped my minutes to 1000/mo for
> $69.99 and just got my bill -- $188.65 for under 600 minutes! I cannot
> afford these bills. Every month I think it will be straightened out.
> Everyone I talk to has similar problems.
>
>
> Paige of Noblesville IN writes (7/23/01):
> I was not told about roaming charges at all when I signed up for free
> long distance..the company finally agreed to eliminate the roaming
> charges but now want to charge me for any overage ... taking away one
> charge but adding another!
>
> I am extremely upset with their desceptive practices, I cannot trust
> them...the rep would not send me their new terms in writing until I
> agreed to them first! I was duped and tricked!
>
>
>
> Angela of Jacksonville FL (1/14/03):
> I signed up for a 250 anytime minute plan plus 3,500 nights/weekends
> with no roaming or long distance. I have been using Cingular since
> 1996, not always on this plan. The last time I changed my plan, it was
> to cost me $29.99 per month for a gross bill of $38.00. My monthly
> bills have ranged anywhere from $45 to $198 with Cingular, which is a
> far cry from the $38.00 per month that I always anticipate.
>
>
> Since June 2001, I have only paid the minimum $38.00 7 times. I became
> concerned at the amount of the monthly bills. Therefore, I began
> attempting to track my usage. However, as usual, the total minutes
> billed did not match my estimates. I was reading on the Internet some
> fine print about being charged airtime for checking your voicemail. In
> addition, when I requested the National plan, I did not sign a
> contract, therefore I was not aware of the $.40 per minute peak
> overlimit charge. I thought I was supposed to be paying around $.19 per
> minute or less. I have asked for detailed billing, but it still does
> not clarify all of the charges. I am concerned that Cingular is
> engaging in illegal billing activity. As a consumer, I would hope that
> someone is reviewing the billing practices of cell phone companies.
>
>
> Colleen of Syracuse NY (1/4/03):
> I signed up for a cell phone for my daughter for X-Mas in 2001. I
> signed up for the $19.99 a month plan with free nights and weekends. I
> was told that if I needed to up the plan to more minutes I could and I
> could also go back to the $19.99 plan anytime. I was planning a trip
> and knew I would need more minutes so changed the plan for one month.
> After the one month I called and changed the plan back to the original
> $19.99 a month plan. Each plan had free nights and weekends. After
> switching back to the $19.99 a month plan I received a bill for $600
> for like 2000 airtime minutes!
>
>
> I immediately called the company and was told that yes I owed this
> amount because when I changed plans my free nights and weekends were no
> longer included. Well, I tried to talk to a manager but was put on hold
> for 20 minutes or more at a time. Each time I would talk to someone
> their story would change. I would ask to speak to the person I had
> already spoken to and would be told that person had gone home even
> though I had spoken with them 20 minutes earlier! It was very
> frustrating and I finally told them to shut the damn phone off and I
> would not pay anything! I lost my temper because I could not speak to
> anyone with any authority nor could I get a straight answer from
> anyone! Very frustrating!
>
>
> The account has been turned over to a collection agency and every bill
> that comes is of course higher than the last. I think the last bill I
> received was for $800. I don't know what to do. I can not afford an
> attorney nor will I pay $800. I feel totally ripped off! The
> consequences are that my credit is being jepordized by a company that
> is taking advantage of people! I really want my daughter to have a cell
> phone in case of an emergency but I refuse to be taken advantage of and
> pay a bogus $800 bill.
>
>
> Colleen is making a big mistake. She should pay the bill, then sue the
> company in Small Claims Court to recover her payments and costs. Her
> present course leads only to more trouble.
>
>
> Lisa of Gravette AR (9/12/02):
> I had 4 phones with Cingular Wireless. We all lived in the state of
> Arkansas and could talk unlimited to each other. This was great for
> about 12 months into my contract. My first bill they sent me that was
> incorrect was for $2600. I was very upset. I called, was on hold for at
> least one hour. I then was told they would have to send it to a
> auditing department. They told me it would take 10 days to resolve the
> problem. The next phone bill was only $1600.00. I normally have $100.00
> phone bills. This continues for 5 months. I was overcharged in the end
> $280.00. I knew I had to pay it because they would send it to
> collections. I didn't feel I could go to an attorney and that cost me
> more. I found this web site and decided to least warn people of this
> company. They were rude and not caring at all with my situation.
>
>
> Hours on the phone was the most upsetting. I now know what they mean
> about going "postal" I threw my phone across my yard after being on
> hold for one hour and finally getting someone, telling them my problem
> and then I lost the signal. The feeling that I had no control over the
> situation that I was just waiting for them to tell me how much I owed
> them. I was able to get out of my contract without paying a penalty.
>
>
> Deborah of Nashua NJ (6/14/01):
> I have a nationwide calling plan with Cingular Wireless (Digital Edge
> USA) with 550 prepaid minutes/month at a flat rate of $70, no roaming
> or long distance anytime, and the calls can be placed from anywhere to
> anywhere in the US.
>
> Cingular applies minutes that I incur outside of their "local" coverage
> area (i.e., roamer minutes) to the following month's bill, on the
> premise that these calls don't show up in their system right away, as
> they are from other carriers. Cingular does not adjust the current
> month for any unused minutes in the month in which the calls were
> ACTUALLY MADE. As such, I get double-billed for these minutes; once in
> the unused pre-paid minutes for the month in which the calls were
> placed, and then again when the calls show up in the following month.
>
>
> This practice causes my airtime for the next period to exceed my limit
> of 550 minutes, resulting in additional fees and taxes over and above
> the pre-paid charge. This practice also leaves the consumer completely
> in the dark regarding how many minutes to expect on their monthly bill
> ... my cellular telephone only tracks calls in real-time, when they are
> actually made, not when they might show up on my Cingular bill.
>
>
> It seems to me that Cingular should be going back and retroactively
> applying roamer minutes to any unused time from the month in which the
> calls were ACTUALLY PLACED, rather than billing them against a period
> in which they did not occur, and do not pertain to. I have complained
> about this practice to Cingular's customer service department with no
> satisfaction (I was treated rudely and laughed at by their
> representative, Ms. Kara Hannah, for making the suggestion).
>
>
> It has been pointed out to me that this was disclosed in the agreement
> that I signed when I entered into the contract with Cingular, and as
> such, it is legal for them to perpetrate this billing practice on their
> customers. However, in my opinion, even though it may be legal, that
> doesn't make it ethical or right. Is there any logical reason why a
> reasonable comsumer should have to accept this type of billing
> practice?
>
>
> My cell phone bills for the last two months, and on one other, prior
> occasion, have been between $100-140, when they should have been about
> $75.
>
>
> Jasmine of Los Angeles (6/4/01):
> My Supervisor and I went to Cingular to inquire about opening a new
> account. We had two problems with the process. First, we inquired about
> a business account. We explained that we had very specific needs, as we
> travel a lot and conduct a great deal of business on the phone from all
> over the country. The representative shared that Cingular had the
> perfect phone to fit our needs. It was not and we had to battle with
> them to exchange the phone without charging although the representative
> lied about the functions this phone had.
>
> In addition, when we initially made the purchase, the Associate
> explained that Cingular offered flexible plans to fit our specific
> needs. He went on to advise us that we should select the Local plan for
> home and switch to a national plan when we travelled. We decided to do
> this as he emphasized repeatedly the fact that this was a simple and
> cost effective process. Moreover he assured us that there were no
> hidden fees if we chose to switch the plan.
>
>
> Two months later after trying to switch the plans the way we'd been
> told we could do, we were advised against this action because of the
> fees that would accrue for roaming charges if the cycle had not been
> completed. I tried to inquire regarding the matter to see if another
> plan may fit our needs but to no avail. I explained that we wished to
> cancel the service as the terms of the contract had been totally
> misrepresented and falsified. Cingular Wireless agreed to cancel the
> contract but insists on us paying the $150.00 fee, which we feel is
> completely unfair.
>
>
> We refuse to pay the fee as the Sales Associate who sold us the
> contract was new on the job (only a few days with the company) which I
> was told by the Manager early on after an earlier descrepincy with the
> phone. We have had the service for two months and have had nothing but
> problems from PacBell.
>
>
> Kelly of California MO (2/8/01):
> Once again I've spent nearly TWO HOURS on the phone trying to
> straighten out my cell phone bill. We purchased this phone in St.
> Joseph Missouri for use by our son in St. Joseph, in our hometown
> (California Missouri), and all points in between. We purchased the
> phone and service with Southwestern Bell Wireless (now Cingular) after
> careful research. We were assured time and time again during the
> purchasing process that use of this phone in St. Joseph, in our
> hometown, and all points in between WOULD NOT result in roaming charges
> or toll charges.
>
> However, each and every month since purchasing this phone we have
> either had to call the Cingular office or go to the retail store to
> straighten out billing problems. We have been and continue to be billed
> roaming and toll charges even though we were ASSURED usage in the areas
> described WOULD NOT result in these charges. Granted, each month the
> charges have been removed and the customer service rep has promised the
> problem has been fixed (after I spent hours on the phone), but we
> continue to have problems.
>
>
> When I have to spend TWO HOURS on the phone trying to fix a problem
> that has been ongoing since July 2000, something is seriously wrong. I
> called the customer service office at 4 pm CST on Jan. 25, 2001, and
> spoke with Frank. After he checked things over and over again for over
> 45 minutes, I grew tired of waiting and finally asked to speak with a
> supervisor. Frank flatly refused to allow me speak with a supervisor! I
> was forced to hang up and call back immediately. I then finally spoke
> with a supervisor named Gary who saw the problem and promised to fix it
> and call me back with the correct billing amount. I waited over an hour
> to hear from him (after he promised to call back in 5 or 10 minutes)
> and finally had to leave for a meeting that I was already late for. He
> finally called an hour and a half later and left a message on my
> answering machine that he would call the next day (1/26) but he never
> called back.
>
>
> To say that I find this type of treatment unacceptable would be an
> understatement! The time and effort I have been forced to put into
> trying to correct something I'm not even at fault for is ridiculous! I
> have contacted Cingular through their website (email) at least six
> times and called their office several times, only to be put on hold.
> Nothing I have done has helped! They WILL NOT contact me regarding this
> billing dispute!
>
>
> Jim P wrote:
> > Well, I got my new phones that I ordered on-line from Cingular on the

> 27th
> > of Dec.
> > Everything seemed ok until my phone would not accept the sim card.
> > (Unauthorized sim) That one had one of my old numbers from Sprint

> that was
> > being ported over to my new phone. It took 4 days to finally fix the

> problem
> > and after several hours of talking to tech support. I look online

> today at
> > my account and there is my first bill for $266.00
> > After a very unsatisfying conversation with a rude rep, I find that

> they
> > have charged me for numerous things that were
> > not explained to me in any way, shape or form. I purchased the family

>
> > plan1250 with 4 free phones, so I was thinking my first bill was

> going to be
> > about $150'ish. Boy was I wrong.
> > Is this going to be typical from Cingular? I was a long-time Sprint
> > customer, and in a way, I am regretting leaving.

>



Reply With Quote
's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-05-2005, 10:24 PM
Then don't read or even respond. If you don't like a post, why even waste
the energy or time to even respond?

"helpster" <pdahelpster1t@helpster.net> wrote in message
news:Ru2dnRNxzv8lwEHcRVn-2g@comcast.com...
> Whats this got to do with NEXTEL , VERIZON Motorola or Ericsson?. We

dislike
> excessive cross posting more then you dislike Cingular. It is pointless

and
> wasteful And if I wanted to read the reports from Consumeraffairs, I can
> certainly go there myself without wasting valuable bandwith on here.
>
>
> <bryan_adrian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1104947711.823859.141450@c13g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> > Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS ON CINGULAR BILLING DISPUTES
> >
> > http://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_...r_billing.html
> >
> > Carolyn of Mullins SC (1/28/03):
> > We purchased a nationwide plan knowing we were going on an extended
> > vacation to California and needed to keep in touch with family here. We
> > were told we had nights and weekends free up to 3500 minutes. We
> > received no written proof of this transaction, and called twice to be
> > sure we had the free minutes and were told we did. We didn't have it in
> > writing, so when our bill came when we returned, we were furuous when
> > told we were charged for roaming charges to the amount of $2000. I
> > think the employees of this company should be trained to know what they
> > are selling. We also had a friend that traveled to alaska and believing
> > they had free minutes were charged for the calls. they got half of
> > their money back, we got none.
> >
> >
> > We were out a lot of money, all they said was sorry, your minutes only
> > count when in S.C. Now the phone is worthless, but will keep it until
> > our contract is up as they charged us $150 to turn in the other phone.
> > i am afraid to use the phone long distance at all now, and plan to turn
> > it in when the contract is up and not get another one.
> >
> >
> > Tamie of Wilsonville AL (10/3/02):
> > I have been overcharged every month since February, and paid the bills,
> > averaging $220+ for one phone. I even upped my minutes to 1000/mo for
> > $69.99 and just got my bill -- $188.65 for under 600 minutes! I cannot
> > afford these bills. Every month I think it will be straightened out.
> > Everyone I talk to has similar problems.
> >
> >
> > Paige of Noblesville IN writes (7/23/01):
> > I was not told about roaming charges at all when I signed up for free
> > long distance..the company finally agreed to eliminate the roaming
> > charges but now want to charge me for any overage ... taking away one
> > charge but adding another!
> >
> > I am extremely upset with their desceptive practices, I cannot trust
> > them...the rep would not send me their new terms in writing until I
> > agreed to them first! I was duped and tricked!
> >
> >
> >
> > Angela of Jacksonville FL (1/14/03):
> > I signed up for a 250 anytime minute plan plus 3,500 nights/weekends
> > with no roaming or long distance. I have been using Cingular since
> > 1996, not always on this plan. The last time I changed my plan, it was
> > to cost me $29.99 per month for a gross bill of $38.00. My monthly
> > bills have ranged anywhere from $45 to $198 with Cingular, which is a
> > far cry from the $38.00 per month that I always anticipate.
> >
> >
> > Since June 2001, I have only paid the minimum $38.00 7 times. I became
> > concerned at the amount of the monthly bills. Therefore, I began
> > attempting to track my usage. However, as usual, the total minutes
> > billed did not match my estimates. I was reading on the Internet some
> > fine print about being charged airtime for checking your voicemail. In
> > addition, when I requested the National plan, I did not sign a
> > contract, therefore I was not aware of the $.40 per minute peak
> > overlimit charge. I thought I was supposed to be paying around $.19 per
> > minute or less. I have asked for detailed billing, but it still does
> > not clarify all of the charges. I am concerned that Cingular is
> > engaging in illegal billing activity. As a consumer, I would hope that
> > someone is reviewing the billing practices of cell phone companies.
> >
> >
> > Colleen of Syracuse NY (1/4/03):
> > I signed up for a cell phone for my daughter for X-Mas in 2001. I
> > signed up for the $19.99 a month plan with free nights and weekends. I
> > was told that if I needed to up the plan to more minutes I could and I
> > could also go back to the $19.99 plan anytime. I was planning a trip
> > and knew I would need more minutes so changed the plan for one month.
> > After the one month I called and changed the plan back to the original
> > $19.99 a month plan. Each plan had free nights and weekends. After
> > switching back to the $19.99 a month plan I received a bill for $600
> > for like 2000 airtime minutes!
> >
> >
> > I immediately called the company and was told that yes I owed this
> > amount because when I changed plans my free nights and weekends were no
> > longer included. Well, I tried to talk to a manager but was put on hold
> > for 20 minutes or more at a time. Each time I would talk to someone
> > their story would change. I would ask to speak to the person I had
> > already spoken to and would be told that person had gone home even
> > though I had spoken with them 20 minutes earlier! It was very
> > frustrating and I finally told them to shut the damn phone off and I
> > would not pay anything! I lost my temper because I could not speak to
> > anyone with any authority nor could I get a straight answer from
> > anyone! Very frustrating!
> >
> >
> > The account has been turned over to a collection agency and every bill
> > that comes is of course higher than the last. I think the last bill I
> > received was for $800. I don't know what to do. I can not afford an
> > attorney nor will I pay $800. I feel totally ripped off! The
> > consequences are that my credit is being jepordized by a company that
> > is taking advantage of people! I really want my daughter to have a cell
> > phone in case of an emergency but I refuse to be taken advantage of and
> > pay a bogus $800 bill.
> >
> >
> > Colleen is making a big mistake. She should pay the bill, then sue the
> > company in Small Claims Court to recover her payments and costs. Her
> > present course leads only to more trouble.
> >
> >
> > Lisa of Gravette AR (9/12/02):
> > I had 4 phones with Cingular Wireless. We all lived in the state of
> > Arkansas and could talk unlimited to each other. This was great for
> > about 12 months into my contract. My first bill they sent me that was
> > incorrect was for $2600. I was very upset. I called, was on hold for at
> > least one hour. I then was told they would have to send it to a
> > auditing department. They told me it would take 10 days to resolve the
> > problem. The next phone bill was only $1600.00. I normally have $100.00
> > phone bills. This continues for 5 months. I was overcharged in the end
> > $280.00. I knew I had to pay it because they would send it to
> > collections. I didn't feel I could go to an attorney and that cost me
> > more. I found this web site and decided to least warn people of this
> > company. They were rude and not caring at all with my situation.
> >
> >
> > Hours on the phone was the most upsetting. I now know what they mean
> > about going "postal" I threw my phone across my yard after being on
> > hold for one hour and finally getting someone, telling them my problem
> > and then I lost the signal. The feeling that I had no control over the
> > situation that I was just waiting for them to tell me how much I owed
> > them. I was able to get out of my contract without paying a penalty.
> >
> >
> > Deborah of Nashua NJ (6/14/01):
> > I have a nationwide calling plan with Cingular Wireless (Digital Edge
> > USA) with 550 prepaid minutes/month at a flat rate of $70, no roaming
> > or long distance anytime, and the calls can be placed from anywhere to
> > anywhere in the US.
> >
> > Cingular applies minutes that I incur outside of their "local" coverage
> > area (i.e., roamer minutes) to the following month's bill, on the
> > premise that these calls don't show up in their system right away, as
> > they are from other carriers. Cingular does not adjust the current
> > month for any unused minutes in the month in which the calls were
> > ACTUALLY MADE. As such, I get double-billed for these minutes; once in
> > the unused pre-paid minutes for the month in which the calls were
> > placed, and then again when the calls show up in the following month.
> >
> >
> > This practice causes my airtime for the next period to exceed my limit
> > of 550 minutes, resulting in additional fees and taxes over and above
> > the pre-paid charge. This practice also leaves the consumer completely
> > in the dark regarding how many minutes to expect on their monthly bill
> > ... my cellular telephone only tracks calls in real-time, when they are
> > actually made, not when they might show up on my Cingular bill.
> >
> >
> > It seems to me that Cingular should be going back and retroactively
> > applying roamer minutes to any unused time from the month in which the
> > calls were ACTUALLY PLACED, rather than billing them against a period
> > in which they did not occur, and do not pertain to. I have complained
> > about this practice to Cingular's customer service department with no
> > satisfaction (I was treated rudely and laughed at by their
> > representative, Ms. Kara Hannah, for making the suggestion).
> >
> >
> > It has been pointed out to me that this was disclosed in the agreement
> > that I signed when I entered into the contract with Cingular, and as
> > such, it is legal for them to perpetrate this billing practice on their
> > customers. However, in my opinion, even though it may be legal, that
> > doesn't make it ethical or right. Is there any logical reason why a
> > reasonable comsumer should have to accept this type of billing
> > practice?
> >
> >
> > My cell phone bills for the last two months, and on one other, prior
> > occasion, have been between $100-140, when they should have been about
> > $75.
> >
> >
> > Jasmine of Los Angeles (6/4/01):
> > My Supervisor and I went to Cingular to inquire about opening a new
> > account. We had two problems with the process. First, we inquired about
> > a business account. We explained that we had very specific needs, as we
> > travel a lot and conduct a great deal of business on the phone from all
> > over the country. The representative shared that Cingular had the
> > perfect phone to fit our needs. It was not and we had to battle with
> > them to exchange the phone without charging although the representative
> > lied about the functions this phone had.
> >
> > In addition, when we initially made the purchase, the Associate
> > explained that Cingular offered flexible plans to fit our specific
> > needs. He went on to advise us that we should select the Local plan for
> > home and switch to a national plan when we travelled. We decided to do
> > this as he emphasized repeatedly the fact that this was a simple and
> > cost effective process. Moreover he assured us that there were no
> > hidden fees if we chose to switch the plan.
> >
> >
> > Two months later after trying to switch the plans the way we'd been
> > told we could do, we were advised against this action because of the
> > fees that would accrue for roaming charges if the cycle had not been
> > completed. I tried to inquire regarding the matter to see if another
> > plan may fit our needs but to no avail. I explained that we wished to
> > cancel the service as the terms of the contract had been totally
> > misrepresented and falsified. Cingular Wireless agreed to cancel the
> > contract but insists on us paying the $150.00 fee, which we feel is
> > completely unfair.
> >
> >
> > We refuse to pay the fee as the Sales Associate who sold us the
> > contract was new on the job (only a few days with the company) which I
> > was told by the Manager early on after an earlier descrepincy with the
> > phone. We have had the service for two months and have had nothing but
> > problems from PacBell.
> >
> >
> > Kelly of California MO (2/8/01):
> > Once again I've spent nearly TWO HOURS on the phone trying to
> > straighten out my cell phone bill. We purchased this phone in St.
> > Joseph Missouri for use by our son in St. Joseph, in our hometown
> > (California Missouri), and all points in between. We purchased the
> > phone and service with Southwestern Bell Wireless (now Cingular) after
> > careful research. We were assured time and time again during the
> > purchasing process that use of this phone in St. Joseph, in our
> > hometown, and all points in between WOULD NOT result in roaming charges
> > or toll charges.
> >
> > However, each and every month since purchasing this phone we have
> > either had to call the Cingular office or go to the retail store to
> > straighten out billing problems. We have been and continue to be billed
> > roaming and toll charges even though we were ASSURED usage in the areas
> > described WOULD NOT result in these charges. Granted, each month the
> > charges have been removed and the customer service rep has promised the
> > problem has been fixed (after I spent hours on the phone), but we
> > continue to have problems.
> >
> >
> > When I have to spend TWO HOURS on the phone trying to fix a problem
> > that has been ongoing since July 2000, something is seriously wrong. I
> > called the customer service office at 4 pm CST on Jan. 25, 2001, and
> > spoke with Frank. After he checked things over and over again for over
> > 45 minutes, I grew tired of waiting and finally asked to speak with a
> > supervisor. Frank flatly refused to allow me speak with a supervisor! I
> > was forced to hang up and call back immediately. I then finally spoke
> > with a supervisor named Gary who saw the problem and promised to fix it
> > and call me back with the correct billing amount. I waited over an hour
> > to hear from him (after he promised to call back in 5 or 10 minutes)
> > and finally had to leave for a meeting that I was already late for. He
> > finally called an hour and a half later and left a message on my
> > answering machine that he would call the next day (1/26) but he never
> > called back.
> >
> >
> > To say that I find this type of treatment unacceptable would be an
> > understatement! The time and effort I have been forced to put into
> > trying to correct something I'm not even at fault for is ridiculous! I
> > have contacted Cingular through their website (email) at least six
> > times and called their office several times, only to be put on hold.
> > Nothing I have done has helped! They WILL NOT contact me regarding this
> > billing dispute!
> >
> >
> > Jim P wrote:
> > > Well, I got my new phones that I ordered on-line from Cingular on the

> > 27th
> > > of Dec.
> > > Everything seemed ok until my phone would not accept the sim card.
> > > (Unauthorized sim) That one had one of my old numbers from Sprint

> > that was
> > > being ported over to my new phone. It took 4 days to finally fix the

> > problem
> > > and after several hours of talking to tech support. I look online

> > today at
> > > my account and there is my first bill for $266.00
> > > After a very unsatisfying conversation with a rude rep, I find that

> > they
> > > have charged me for numerous things that were
> > > not explained to me in any way, shape or form. I purchased the family

> >
> > > plan1250 with 4 free phones, so I was thinking my first bill was

> > going to be
> > > about $150'ish. Boy was I wrong.
> > > Is this going to be typical from Cingular? I was a long-time Sprint
> > > customer, and in a way, I am regretting leaving.

> >

>
>



Reply With Quote
Tropical Haven
Tropical Haven's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-10-2005, 01:48 AM


bryan_adrian@yahoo.com wrote:
> Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS ON CINGULAR BILLING DISPUTES
>
> http://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_...r_billing.html
>
> Carolyn of Mullins SC (1/28/03):
> We purchased a nationwide plan knowing we were going on an extended
> vacation to California and needed to keep in touch with family here. We
> were told we had nights and weekends free up to 3500 minutes. We
> received no written proof of this transaction, and called twice to be
> sure we had the free minutes and were told we did. We didn't have it in
> writing, so when our bill came when we returned, we were furuous when
> told we were charged for **roaming** charges to the amount of $2000. I
> think the employees of this company...


I think consumers should learn what a calling area is. I think they
should also learn what roaming is/is not applicable (for example in
Cingular Preferred Nation, roaming rates do apply in certain areas, as
do roaming rates in certain areas of Verizon Wireless' America's Choice).

> Tamie of Wilsonville AL (10/3/02):
> I have been overcharged every month since February, and paid the bills,
> averaging $220+ for one phone. I even upped my minutes to 1000/mo for
> $69.99 and just got my bill -- $188.65 for under 600 minutes! I cannot
> afford these bills. Every month I think it will be straightened out.
> Everyone I talk to has similar problems.


Does it specify all charges are for voice? Maybe someone is using the
phone for data.

> Paige of Noblesville IN writes (7/23/01):
> I was not told about roaming charges at all when I signed up for free
> long distance..the company finally agreed to eliminate the roaming
> charges but now want to charge me for any overage ... taking away one
> charge but adding another!


One should know what long distance is before signing up for any type of
phone service in his own name. Ignorance is no excuse.

> I am extremely upset with their desceptive practices, I cannot trust
> them...the rep would not send me their new terms in writing until I
> agreed to them first! I was duped and tricked!


Duped and tricked by your own ignorance.

> Angela of Jacksonville FL (1/14/03):
> I signed up for a 250 anytime minute plan plus 3,500 nights/weekends
> with no roaming or long distance. I have been using Cingular since
> 1996, not always on this plan. The last time I changed my plan, it was
> to cost me $29.99 per month for a gross bill of $38.00. My monthly
> bills have ranged anywhere from $45 to $198 with Cingular, which is a
> far cry from the $38.00 per month that I always anticipate.
>
>
> Since June 2001, I have only paid the minimum $38.00 7 times. I became
> concerned at the amount of the monthly bills. Therefore, I began
> attempting to track my usage. However, as usual, the total minutes
> billed did not match my estimates. I was reading on the Internet some
> fine print about being charged airtime for checking your voicemail. In
> addition, when I requested the National plan, I did not sign a
> contract, therefore I was not aware of the $.40 per minute peak
> overlimit charge. I thought I was supposed to be paying around $.19 per
> minute or less.


Wow...that's cheap. Why didn't you verify this?

> I have asked for detailed billing, but it still does
> not clarify all of the charges. I am concerned that Cingular is
> engaging in illegal billing activity. As a consumer, I would hope that
> someone is reviewing the billing practices of cell phone companies.


Maybe sit down with a friend and add up the charges. If there is a
billing error, Cingular will be more than happy to fix it. They provide
the service, however a software firm does the billing software, and bugs
happen.

Okay, enough is enough, I'm not going any further with this message.

Point is -- consumers need to be aware of what's going on. Most
consumers are becoming more and more ignorant. Always look at all
angles and base your decisions on the information you have. When you
could get more information but choose not to, you are letting yourself
be ignorant.

Now, I'm not saying Cingular is perfect here. In fact, my replies have
nothing to do with Cingular. It's just that those customers had no idea
what they were getting, and apparently chose not look deeper into the
situation. I'm sure Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile, Nextel, and Sprint all
have their share of ignorant consumers.

TH

TH

Reply With Quote
Quick
Quick's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-10-2005, 03:05 AM
Tropical Haven wrote:
> bryan_adrian@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS ON CINGULAR BILLING DISPUTES
>>
>> http://www.consumeraffairs.com/cell_...r_billing.html
>>
>> Carolyn of Mullins SC (1/28/03):
>> We purchased a nationwide plan knowing we were going on an extended
>> vacation to California and needed to keep in touch with family here.
>> We were told we had nights and weekends free up to 3500 minutes. We
>> received no written proof of this transaction, and called twice to be
>> sure we had the free minutes and were told we did. We didn't have it
>> in writing, so when our bill came when we returned, we were furuous
>> when told we were charged for **roaming** charges to the amount of
>> $2000. I think the employees of this company...


~50 hours of keeping in touch with the family? Why did they go on
vacation? and what did they have time to see?

-Quick


Reply With Quote
Joel Kolstad
Joel Kolstad's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-10-2005, 05:42 AM
"Tropical Haven" <user@example.net> wrote in message
news:41E1DF08.5070800@example.net...
> Now, I'm not saying Cingular is perfect here. In fact, my replies have
> nothing to do with Cingular. It's just that those customers had no idea
> what they were getting, and apparently chose not look deeper into the
> situation. I'm sure Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile, Nextel, and Sprint all
> have their share of ignorant consumers.


This is all true, but it's a sad commentary on society today that many of
the representatives of the companies you list will knowingly let ignorant
people get themselves in trouble, and even mislead them in order to make a
sale when they know that what they're selling isn't what the customer
desires.


Reply With Quote
Debbie Smythe
Debbie Smythe's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
TONS of CONSUMER COMPLAINTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-10-2005, 08:14 PM
For any of you out there angered and fed up with the CINGULAR TAKE
CHARGE services of Cingular, which offers free minutes after 9pm and on
weekends, on the accounts valued over $40 per month, but does in no way
give or award or service the free mintues, please contact the Class
Action lawfirm of Lieff Cabraser, they are great at this kind of case
and will easily prove that the free minutes are never received by the
Take Charge clients, even though the customer service computers for the
Take Charge Cingular customers show zero charge for weekend and after
9pm calls -- the outstanding team of investigators of LCHB and their
friends in politics can quickly root out the problem.

http://www.lieffcabraser.com/

AND, they would LOVE to hear from you! Do not be shy.

**************
DIEBOLD and ES&S FRAUD

THANKS JOHN NAVAS!

John Navas wrote: "US needs UN election observers to
rescue
our voters from
corruption..."


Did you know.... ?????????? DIEBOLD is the Devil !!!!!!!

1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only
two companies: Diebold and ES&S.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting...804landes.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold


2. There is no federal agency with regulatory
authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0916-04.htm


http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting...804landes.html


3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president
of ES&S are brothers.


http://www.americanfreepress.net/htm...e_company.html

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting...804landes.html


4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush
campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was
"committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the
president next year."


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in632436.shtml

http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886


5. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be
chairman of ES&S. He became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S
machines.

http://www.motherjones.com/commentar...03/03_200.html

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting...4fitrakis.html


6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, long-connected
with the Bush family, was recently caught lying about his ownership
of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.


http://www.blackboxvoting.com/module...article&sid=26

http://www.hillnews.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx

http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000896.php



7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George
W. Bush's vice-presidential candidates.

http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_28/b3689130.htm

http://theindependent.com/stories/05...w_hagel27.html


8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer
in the U.S. and counts almost 60% of all U.S. votes.

http://www.essvote.com/HTML/about/about.html

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting...804landes.html


9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have
no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there is no way to
verify that the data coming out of the machine is the same as what was
legitimately put in by voters.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm

http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/041...s/pfindex.html

10. Diebold also makes ATMs, checkout scanners, and
ticket machines, all of which log each transaction and can
generate a paper trail.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm

http://www.diebold.com/solutions/default.htm


11. Diebold is based in Ohio.

http://www.diebold.com/aboutus/ataglance/default.htm


12. Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as
consultants and developers to help write the central compiler
computer code that counted 50% of the votes in 30 states.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.html

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml


13. Jeff Dean was Senior Vice-President of General
Election Systems when it was bought by Diebold. Even though he had
been convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree, Jeff
Dean was retained as a consultant by Diebold and was largely
responsible for programming the optical scanning software now used in
most of the United States.


http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0312/S00191.htm
http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf


14. Diebold consultant Jeff Dean was convicted of
planting back doors in his software and using a "high degree of
sophistication" to evade detection over a period of 2 years.

http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf


15. None of the international election observers
were allowed in the polls in Ohio.

http://www.globalexchange.org/update/press/2638.html

http://www.enquirer.com/editions/200...oc_elexoh.html


16. California banned the use of Diebold machines
because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold's claims that
the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee was able to do it!
(See the movie here:
http://blackboxvoting.org/baxter/baxterVPR.mov.)

http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63298,00.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4874190


17. 30% of all U.S. votes are carried out on
unverifiable touch screen voting machines with no paper trail.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in632436.shtml


18. All -- not some -- butallthe voting machine
errors detected and reported in Florida went in favor of Bush or
Republican candidates.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65757,00.html

http://www.yuricareport.com/Election...sBushIsOut.htm

http://www.rise4news.net/extravotes.html

http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.ph...icle&sid= 950

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm


19. The governor of the state of Florida, Jeb Bush,
is the President's brother.

http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/talla...al/7628725.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Oct29.html


20. Serious voting anomalies in Florida -- again
always favoring Bush -- have been mathematically demonstrated and
experts are recommending further investigation.

http://www.yuricareport.com/Election...sBushIsOut.htm

http://www.computerworld.com/governm...,97614,00.html

http://www.americanfreepress.net/htm...thousands.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/110904.html
http://uscountvotes.org/

Reply With Quote
John Navas
John Navas's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: TONS of CONSUMER COMPLAINTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES
Posted: 01-10-2005, 08:40 PM
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <1105388073.059196.33800@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups. com> on 10 Jan 2005
12:14:33 -0800, "Debbie Smythe" <debra_smythe@yahoo.com> wrote:

>For any of you out there angered and fed up with the CINGULAR TAKE
>CHARGE services of Cingular, which offers free minutes after 9pm and on
>weekends, on the accounts valued over $40 per month, but does in no way
>give or award or service the free mintues, please contact the Class
>Action lawfirm of Lieff Cabraser, they are great at this kind of case
>and will easily prove that the free minutes are never received by the
>Take Charge clients, even though the customer service computers for the
>Take Charge Cingular customers show zero charge for weekend and after
>9pm calls -- the outstanding team of investigators of LCHB and their
>friends in politics can quickly root out the problem.
>
>http://www.lieffcabraser.com/
>
>AND, they would LOVE to hear from you! Do not be shy.
>[SNIP]


LOL! I'm willing to bet this won't go anywhere. Any takers?!

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
Reply With Quote
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Venting.....Tens of CONSUMER REPORTS on CINGULAR billing DISPUTES bryan_adrian@yahoo.com Sony Ericsson 10 01-10-2005 09:43 PM
Bluetooth and billing with a mobile all mail refused Bluetooth 1 09-16-2004 08:31 AM
Transfering tens of photos to a PC Fran?ois-Xavier Testard-Vaillant Sony Ericsson 0 08-24-2004 10:27 AM
Re: T-Mobile Billing Airtime on Voicemail Usage Rod GSM 2 08-04-2003 02:10 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 AM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33