Re: John Navas - Does Cingular pay you?

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <1104795946.784029.18290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups. com> on 3 Jan 2005
15:45:46 -0800, "CHELSEA" <chelsea_57@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
>of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.
>
>Who started the other "cellular" groups?
>
>Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
>at all!

How many successful newsgroups have you created? Or are you just shooting off
your mouth? ;-)

The hard part is not in creating an alt newsgroup, but in doing it right.
alt.cellular.cingular was successful from the beginning because I followed
proper procedures and persuaded major news providers to carry it.

>ps: John Navas needs a real job ...

I have a real job. You need some real manners (unless you enjoy making
yourself look childish).


>JohnF wrote:
>> "John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>> news:10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com...
>> > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>> >
>> > In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03
>Jan 2005
>> > 15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
>> > >>
>> > >> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like
>this.
>> > >
>> > >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that
>was.
>> >
>> > Why?
>>
>> Because you claim it takes so much time. Even if you did in fact
>"create"
>> this newsgroup you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up
>wit
>> hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it. Since you're patting
>yourself on
>> the back so hard please explain how much time it takes and what's
>involved
>> with "creating a newsgroup". I'm very interested.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

John Navas wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <1104795946.784029.18290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups. com> on 3 Jan 2005
> 15:45:46 -0800, "CHELSEA" <chelsea_57@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
>>of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.
>>
>>Who started the other "cellular" groups?
>>
>>Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
>>at all!
>
>
> How many successful newsgroups have you created? Or are you just shooting off
> your mouth? ;-)
>
> The hard part is not in creating an alt newsgroup, but in doing it right.
> alt.cellular.cingular was successful from the beginning because I followed
> proper procedures and persuaded major news providers to carry it.
>
>
>>ps: John Navas needs a real job ...
>
>
> I have a real job. You need some real manners (unless you enjoy making
> yourself look childish).
>



I see SMARTASS John Navas is still acting like a jerk on yet ANOTHER
newsgroup. His reputation from comp.dcom.modems still carries on.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <10tk2i65d4ttp6e@news.supernews.com> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:15:17 -0800,
John <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

>I see SMARTASS John Navas is still acting like a jerk on yet ANOTHER
>newsgroup. His reputation from comp.dcom.modems still carries on.

In fact quite a good reputation.

Is that the best you can do? ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

Whoa Chelsea!!!

Some serious animosity going on here... WHY? I don't know.

As this is a *newgroup*, its is an open forum to post news on *pertinent
subjects* in which one may have a particular knowledge that others do not,
and are willing to share with those who seek it.

John Navas has demonstrated useful knowledge concerning Ericsson celulars
(at least) and other models from his post in other groups.
Scott Stephenson, I'm not too familiar with(sorry dude).

I don' know what ur beef is with these two, but please keep in mind *WHERE*
where and *WHAT* you are postng.

You are not helping anyone in this(or any other) group by posting rants etc.
It's actually upsetting...

This group is for Sony Ericsson(among other) cellular owners who want to get
a little ore out of their equipment.

Would you mind please keep this forum(and others) based on its name.. let's
not make it "alt.rants.I've_got_a_beef.cellular"

Dude/Dudette, I'm pretty sure you have better stuff to do that.

No one needs the stress...


"CHELSEA" <chelsea_57@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1104795946.784029.18290@f14g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Winnie the Pooh started alt.cellular.verizon, and she says it took all
> of the time to take the cookies out of the oven.
>
> Who started the other "cellular" groups?
>
> Starting a group is like smacking a fool in the face, it takes no time
> at all!
>
> Cheers!
>
> ps: John Navas needs a real job and to get off of his knees in servile
> submission to the cell phone dynasties. Or to get some knee pads and
> find a few hobbies so he does not irritate so many other posters with
> his poppycock.
>
> Maybe he could go into business with Scott Stephenson, say earplugs or
> something, for monks in Tibet? Or janitor at the US State Department,
> or call taker for one of the cell phone customer service centers
> outsourced to India.
>
> JohnF wrote:
> > "John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
> > news:10tjbl694hk2nf5@corp.supernews.com...
> > > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> > >
> > > In <elmop-1F205A.15350503012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Mon, 03
> Jan 2005
> > > 15:35:05 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >In article <10tj9imkjj4vode@corp.supernews.com>,
> > > > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> >So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?
> > > >>
> > > >> I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like
> this.
> > > >
> > > >Tell us (a) how many hours you spent doing so, and (b) when that
> was.
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Because you claim it takes so much time. Even if you did in fact
> "create"
> > this newsgroup you act as though someone else wouldn't have come up
> wit
> > hthis unique idea if you hadn't done it. Since you're patting
> yourself on
> > the back so hard please explain how much time it takes and what's
> involved
> > with "creating a newsgroup". I'm very interested.
>