GSM Hacks > General Mobile Discussion > Mobile Technologies > GSM > Encrypted cell phones in the US

Encrypted cell phones in the US

Posted: 12-08-2005, 11:25 PM
Welda
Welda's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
I am trying to gather information on how big the market is for secure
mobile phones, particularly in the United States. At the moment, I see
a lot of OEMs like General Dynamics, CryptoPhone and Qualcomm make
solutions, are there any others?

What is the reason behind companies being in only the voice or data
space, and not both. If I have a phone and want to make secure calls,
why do I have to buy another device to send encrypted e-mails?

The market of end users seems to be predominently for national security
agencies, but are there any companies making inroads into the
enterprise market?

There is even a question on whether its necessary or not. My research
has pulled up a number of articles stating that 3G systems are secure
anyway, so why would you need anything further.

Finally, the industry seems very small, and could really use a major
catalyst like a senator's conversation with a big donor, or a
stockbroker speaking to a client getting out onto the Internet. Does
anyone know if anything like this has happened?

Thanks!

Reply With Quote

Responses to "Encrypted cell phones in the US"

Simon VK3XEM
Simon VK3XEM's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-09-2005, 01:45 AM
Welda wrote:
> I am trying to gather information on how big the market is for secure
> mobile phones, particularly in the United States. At the moment, I see
> a lot of OEMs like General Dynamics, CryptoPhone and Qualcomm make
> solutions, are there any others?
>
> What is the reason behind companies being in only the voice or data
> space, and not both. If I have a phone and want to make secure calls,
> why do I have to buy another device to send encrypted e-mails?
>
> The market of end users seems to be predominently for national security
> agencies, but are there any companies making inroads into the
> enterprise market?
>
> There is even a question on whether its necessary or not. My research
> has pulled up a number of articles stating that 3G systems are secure
> anyway, so why would you need anything further.
>
> Finally, the industry seems very small, and could really use a major
> catalyst like a senator's conversation with a big donor, or a
> stockbroker speaking to a client getting out onto the Internet. Does
> anyone know if anything like this has happened?
>
> Thanks!

I have seen software for my Symbian phone for encrypted SMS. Haven't
had a need to use it and would need the recipient to run the same
software at the other end, so haven't bothered.

Have a look at http://www.handango.com/ or http://www.My-Symbian.com/


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
Reply With Quote
cryptonom
cryptonom's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-09-2005, 01:07 PM
Simon VK3XEM wrote:
> Welda wrote:
>
>> I am trying to gather information on how big the market is for secure
>> mobile phones, particularly in the United States. At the moment, I see
>> a lot of OEMs like General Dynamics, CryptoPhone and Qualcomm make
>> solutions, are there any others?
>>
>> What is the reason behind companies being in only the voice or data
>> space, and not both. If I have a phone and want to make secure calls,
>> why do I have to buy another device to send encrypted e-mails?
>>
>> The market of end users seems to be predominently for national security
>> agencies, but are there any companies making inroads into the
>> enterprise market?
>>
>> There is even a question on whether its necessary or not. My research
>> has pulled up a number of articles stating that 3G systems are secure
>> anyway, so why would you need anything further.
>>
>> Finally, the industry seems very small, and could really use a major
>> catalyst like a senator's conversation with a big donor, or a
>> stockbroker speaking to a client getting out onto the Internet. Does
>> anyone know if anything like this has happened?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>
> I have seen software for my Symbian phone for encrypted SMS. Haven't
> had a need to use it and would need the recipient to run the same
> software at the other end, so haven't bothered.
>
> Have a look at http://www.handango.com/ or http://www.My-Symbian.com/
>
>

There is also SpiderSMS (http://www.lucabarbi.it/lec/spidersms.htm),
FortressSMS (http://www.fortressmail.net/fortress_sms.htm),
Xecure (http://www.mynetsec.com/xms/), and sci.crypt's favorite,
CryptoSMS (http://www.cryptosms.com); all of which address the
same issue on different mobile platforms, i.e. your SMS can be
easily read by anybody who works for your provider, anybody who
can access the govt database of "stored" communications, or even
anybody with one of those commercially available cell phone monitors.

I do not use SMS, but if I did, I would definitely acquire whichever
one of these programs ran on my cell phone. The examples of SMS abuse
cited in the news reports are growing rapidly.
Reply With Quote
Joseph Ashwood
Joseph Ashwood's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-09-2005, 09:59 PM
"cryptonom" <cryptonom@att.NOT> wrote in message
news:lkfmf.251777$zb5.49095@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

Juat adding the missing word

and sci.crypt's [_*_*_*_*_*_LEAST*_*_*_*_*_] favorite,
> CryptoSMS (http://www.cryptosms.com)

We had extremely long discussions surrounding it. Not going back into them,
check google groups if you need a recap.
Joe


Reply With Quote
Simon VK3XEM
Simon VK3XEM's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-10-2005, 12:07 AM
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
> "cryptonom" <cryptonom@att.NOT> wrote in message
> news:lkfmf.251777$zb5.49095@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> Juat adding the missing word
>
> and sci.crypt's [_*_*_*_*_*_LEAST*_*_*_*_*_] favorite,
>
>>CryptoSMS (http://www.cryptosms.com)
>
>
> We had extremely long discussions surrounding it. Not going back into them,
> check google groups if you need a recap.
> Joe

Crypto SMS is not available for Nokia.



--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
Reply With Quote
Welda
Welda's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-11-2005, 06:35 PM
Actually not really that interested in encrypted SMS messages but
thanks all the same.

What about secure cell phones? Which companies are deploying encrypted
mobile solutions for their senior management?

How do companies decide on what systems to purchase - is it looking at
the quality of the algorithms, or whether the phone can do voice and
data?

Finally, how secure is GSM, CDMA and 3G. Some experts say its almost
bulletproof, others say its hackable with equipment you can buy from
the Internet.

Reply With Quote
cryptonom
cryptonom's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-11-2005, 07:52 PM
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
> "cryptonom" <cryptonom@att.NOT> wrote in message
> news:lkfmf.251777$zb5.49095@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> Juat adding the missing word
>
> and sci.crypt's [_*_*_*_*_*_LEAST*_*_*_*_*_] favorite,
>
>>CryptoSMS (http://www.cryptosms.com)
>
>
> We had extremely long discussions surrounding it. Not going back into them,
> check google groups if you need a recap.
> Joe
>
>

Guess it would have been appropriate for me to have put
a winky face on that "favorite" statement because you
obviously missed my joke. )-;

Surely everyone remembers those long running discussions.

As bullying in sci.crypt seems to be the topic du jour,
your response does bring up the question:

What bug did this SMS girl push up your ass that makes
you jump to put her down as quickly as possible?

All throughout those long discussions, she claimed that you
emailed copies of your postings to her (presumably to keep her
coming back to sci.crypt for more abuse).

Was that true, or was she lying about your emails?
Reply With Quote
cryptonom@att.NOT
cryptonom@att.NOT's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-12-2005, 12:18 AM
Welda wrote:

> Actually not really that interested in encrypted SMS messages but
> thanks all the same.
>
> What about secure cell phones? Which companies are deploying encrypted
> mobile solutions for their senior management?
>
> How do companies decide on what systems to purchase - is it looking at
> the quality of the algorithms, or whether the phone can do voice and
> data?
>
> Finally, how secure is GSM, CDMA and 3G. Some experts say its almost
> bulletproof, others say its hackable with equipment you can buy from
> the Internet.
>

There is certainly plenty of cell phone monitoring equipment available.
Here are links to a couple of particularly scary looking ones:

http://www.chiare.com/products/spy/GSM900-1800e.htm
http://accelerated-promotions.com/co...terception.htm

Those were easy to find and there lots more to be found just by googling
for the obvious.

http://www.google.com/search?en&q=cell+phone+monitoring

Reply With Quote
Joseph Ashwood
Joseph Ashwood's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US
Posted: 12-12-2005, 08:07 AM
"Welda" <juliantate@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134326129.386740.189480@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Finally, how secure is GSM, CDMA and 3G. Some experts say its almost
> bulletproof, others say its hackable with equipment you can buy from
> the Internet.

These are all from memory so there might be some flaws. GSM and CDMA are
battered, bruised and broken from a security standpoint. 3GSM (there are
actually multiple 3G standards but 3GSM is the major player right now) in
it's native mode appears to be secure, it uses a variation of a published
and analyzed cipher, but I don't believe the actual 3GSM algorithm has
received noticable public attention. The bigger weakness in 3GSM is that all
implementations that I am aware of actually have a fallback mode to GSM, and
while I haven't looked at the exact protocol, this type of fallback behavior
has a history of problems (SSL makes a good example). Regardless, these are
all only between handset and basestation, not from handset to handset, there
are arguments on both sides of this, but it does provide a wiretapping point
which may or may not matter.
Joe


Reply With Quote
Joseph Ashwood
Joseph Ashwood's Avatar
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Encrypted cell phones in the US (leaving topic)
Posted: 12-12-2005, 08:07 AM
"cryptonom" <cryptonom@att.NOT> wrote in message
news:vs%mf.266056$zb5.159925@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>> "cryptonom" <cryptonom@att.NOT> wrote in message
>> news:lkfmf.251777$zb5.49095@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>
>> Juat adding the missing word
>>
>> and sci.crypt's [_*_*_*_*_*_LEAST*_*_*_*_*_] favorite,
>>
>>>CryptoSMS (http://www.cryptosms.com)
>>
>>
>> We had extremely long discussions surrounding it. Not going back into
>> them, check google groups if you need a recap.
>> Joe
>
> Guess it would have been appropriate for me to have put
> a winky face on that "favorite" statement because you
> obviously missed my joke. )-;

I figured there was plenty of sarcasm in there to go around, but since the
OP hasn't been around I felt it was worth directly pointing out.

> Surely everyone remembers those long running discussions.
>
> As bullying in sci.crypt seems to be the topic du jour,
> your response does bring up the question:
>
> What bug did this SMS girl push up your ass that makes
> you jump to put her down as quickly as possible?

I was grumpy that day, the window of opportunity for the funding of
development for one of my ventures had just expired and I freely admit I
took it out on a target of opportunity.

> All throughout those long discussions, she claimed that you
> emailed copies of your postings to her (presumably to keep her
> coming back to sci.crypt for more abuse).
>
> Was that true, or was she lying about your emails?

The only claim of that nature that I remember was that I had sent the first
message via email as well, and that one is true, you will in fact find a
notation at the beginning of my first response stating such.
Joe


Reply With Quote
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Blackberry 7230 Phone Function on TMobile | Simplest SMS & serial-to-PC still available ? »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will a BT adapter for non-BT cell phones also work with landline cordless phones? MS Bluetooth 1 05-22-2005 05:51 PM
How is the firmware encrypted? An Metet Motorola 1 09-07-2003 03:53 AM
USED CELL PHONES M.A.S. 57 Nokia 0 07-20-2003 06:57 AM
Encrypted SMS for Nokia series 60 released Tony Nokia 0 06-23-2003 12:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:15 PM.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33