gsm & north america

You are obviously ignorant of the word coverage, or Australian GSM networks.

--
StreetwisE


"Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NOcom> wrote in message
news:317o10l43miq4ks06gicdq80pr0gukba8r@4ax.com...
| On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:50:15 +1100, "Streetwise"
| <Hit_Reply_Group_Button@Thanks.com> wrote:
|
| >Ummmm, you might want to revise your comments re Australian coverage,
one
| >link is GSM the other CDMA.
| >
| >
| >http://www.telstra.com.au/mobile/networks/info/gsm.htm
| >
| >http://www.telstra.com.au/mobile/networks/info/cdma.htm
|
| The question was the amount of *GSM* coverage. My comment still
| stands.
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| remove NO from .NOcom to reply

thank you both of you for the info, the australian coverage means nothing to
me. I mostly wanted to know about the coverage of gsm in morth america,
mostly because I live here but in my state about 30 miles from the central
part of the state you have no gsm coverage, which truly sucks because the
population is obvisously warranting cdma, tdma and iden to put service
there, so I am trying to figure out why gsm lacks so much. t mobile is the
only one in my state, att is just barely tapped the gsm area and cingular is
not even here, which is odd for company that claims such huge numbers yet
covers very little of the midwest.

Capt.
"Joseph" <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.NOcom> wrote in message
newsnvo1055qeiind7u716tej7u65vgs2bcbn@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:04:29 +1100, "Streetwise"
> <Hit_Reply_Group_Button@Thanks.com> wrote:
>
> >You are obviously ignorant of the word coverage, or Australian GSM
networks.
>
> Funny when you go to gsmworld.com and click on all four of the
> Australian GSM networks most of 'em have major coverage in
> southeastern Australia with very little coverage anywhere else.
> Hutchison has practically *nothing*! Maybe you're saying that the
> coverage maps that gsmworld has are completely wrong and the whole
> country is covered from west to east and north to south.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> remove NO from .NOcom to reply