Re: SMS and AT commands
Posted: 12-29-2003, 07:35 PM
According to the responses of CPMS? the phone seems to have only 11 messages
recognized?
If you can get the 44 messages via MMI menu then it would be interesting to
know how the other 33 messages differ to the available 11 messages?
Are the additional 33 messages maybe only outgoing messages(SMS-SUBMIT) or
maybe status reports and that's why CPMS does not report them???
If CPMS=? returns +CPMS: ("SM"),("SM"),("MT") then this means that the
phone does not offer other choices of memory for CPMS set-command.
If it would be possible to switch to MT memory then CPMS=? would return
responses like +CPMS: ("SM","MT"),("SM","MT"),("MT") , so it is OK that
CPMS="MT" returns ERROR because the phone does not support it.
Usually MT is a combination of SM+ME, what if you try to send
AT+CPMS="SM","SM","SM" ??? Does the phone accepts this?
From my experience I can say that the implementation of the various GSM
07.07 AT-Commands in many GSM phones are sometimes buggy and do not exactly
follow the GSM standard. It could be that you can not read out all 44
messages because of a faulty AT-command implementation.
Regards
Peter
"Christoph Hölken" <chrhoelken@gmx.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:bspseo$liv$06$1@news.t-online.com...
> Hi there,
>
> having failed just again to communicate with my cell phone via AT
commands,
> I've to ask for your help.
>
> My problem is that I'm unable to retrieve a list of SMS available on the
> device. AT+CMGL=4 retrieves a list of messages, but unfortunately an
> incomplete one (about 11 out of 44). Suspecting that the wrong memory
> storage is selected, I tried AT+CPMS. AT+CPMS=? displays
> +CPMS: ("SM"),("SM"),("MT") and AT+CPMS? results in
> +CPMS: "SM",11,15,"SM",11,15,"MT",11,15. But every attempt to actually
> change the selected storage (eg. by AT+CPMS="MT") fails with a simple
> ERROR message.
>
> I can reproduce this on a Nokia 6600 as well as an older Siemens S45i. As
> with both devices the problems are similiar, I guess there is some mistake
> in my approach.
>
> Any reply will be greatly appreciated!
>
> TIA,
> Christoph



Linear Mode

