Kerry's REAL name?

Come January 20, 2005 at noon it will be President John Kerry.


Bush peaked too early and his disastrous showing in the debates will do
him in. No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
down for the year.

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004, at 10:58:51 [GMT GMT] (20:58:51 Sunday, 3 October 2004
where I live) "Jack Zwick" wrote:

> No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
> down for the year.

Yawn.

--
If you're cross-eyed and have dyslexia, can you read all right?

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:58:51 GMT, Jack Zwick <jzwick3@mindspring.com>
wrote:

>Come January 20, 2005 at noon it will be President John Kerry.
>
>
>Bush peaked too early and his disastrous showing in the debates will do
>him in.

Huh? You'd better go look at the polls again. Kerry won on style, Bush
on substance. BUSH won, in a landslide, on the question "which one is
a stronger leader".

>No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
>down for the year.

Talk about grasping at straws...LOL.

"Jack Zwick" <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:jzwick3-0939C2.05582203102004@news1.west.earthlink.net...
> Come January 20, 2005 at noon it will be President John Kerry.
>
>
> Bush peaked too early and his disastrous showing in the debates will do
> him in.

Disastrous? When does the buzzer go off, cause you're spinning like a
laundromat dryer.

> No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
> down for the year.

Great, numerology and trend prediction for President.

Let us know how 8th grade works out for you.

Venger

In article <l630m0hthripaqotv08t2o2tf2kpc49kp5@4ax.com>,
JustForFun <justforfun69@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:58:51 GMT, Jack Zwick <jzwick3@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Come January 20, 2005 at noon it will be President John Kerry.
> >
> >
> >Bush peaked too early and his disastrous showing in the debates will do
> >him in.
>
> Huh? You'd better go look at the polls again.

I just did, you check the latest NewsWeek poll?

In article <702509779.20041003213600@deadspam.com>,
John Phillips<flatulentdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 03 Oct 2004, at 10:58:51 [GMT GMT] (20:58:51 Sunday, 3 October 2004
> where I live) "Jack Zwick" wrote:
>
> > No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
> > down for the year.
>
> Yawn.

Just the facts, John.

In article <yMU7d.814$Al3.300@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>,
"Venger" <Venger@augustmail.com> wrote:

>
> "Jack Zwick" <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:jzwick3-0939C2.05582203102004@news1.west.earthlink.net...
> > Come January 20, 2005 at noon it will be President John Kerry.
> >
> >
> > Bush peaked too early and his disastrous showing in the debates will do
> > him in.
>
> Disastrous? When does the buzzer go off, cause you're spinning like a
> laundromat dryer.
>
> > No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
> > down for the year.
>
> Great, numerology and trend prediction for President.
>
> Let us know how 8th grade works out for you.
>
> Venger

Gee, I skipped the 8th grade, went straight to 9th grade,
and then after High School onto full academic scholarship in college.


You the one that was convinced Dole was gonna beat Clinton?

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 15:54:20 GMT, Jack Zwick <jzwick3@mindspring.com>
wrote:

>In article <702509779.20041003213600@deadspam.com>,
> John Phillips<flatulentdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 03 Oct 2004, at 10:58:51 [GMT GMT] (20:58:51 Sunday, 3 October 2004
>> where I live) "Jack Zwick" wrote:
>>
>> > No incumbant has EVER been re-elected when the stock market is
>> > down for the year.
>>
>> Yawn.
>
>Just the facts, John.

Great, then show the coorelation. How often has the stock market BEEN
down for the year in an election year? How many challengers have won
in years where the market was UP? It's a stupid statement that has no
bearing on the election at all unless you can show a coorelation.