Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 05-24-2004, 07:48 PM

Danny

Posts: n/a

Hi,

I find Bluetooth amazing, and I am sure that it will be incorporated in many
of the new electronic things to come.

However I was wondering, what exactly will it be in?

Will I be able top buy Bluetooth headphones for my Discman?

Will I be able to buy a complete Bluetooth desktop? (monitor; printer;
speakers; webcam; mouse; keyboard)

And how long will it be until these gadgets come around, and are available
to a normal home computer user like myself?

Any ideas?

Danny

Reply With Quote

Responses to "Bluetooth Future???"

Henryk Plötz

Posts: n/a

Re: Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 05-25-2004, 05:52 AM

Moin,

Am Mon, 24 May 2004 19:48:43 +0100 schrieb Danny:

> Will I be able top buy Bluetooth headphones for my Discman?

May be.

> Will I be able to buy a complete Bluetooth desktop?
> (monitor;

No.

> printer;

Yes, already available.

> speakers;

Maybe, but you will need to compress the audio stream. For an example
look at http://www.bluemp3.de/ (partially in German).

> webcam;

Probably no. Current webcams tend to have problems with USB's bandwidth
(up to 12 MBit/s) and thus need compression. Bluetooth supports only up
to 723 kBit/s (per piconet).

> mouse; keyboard)

Yes, already available from Logitech, Apple and Microsoft (and probably
others).

--
Henryk Plötz
Grüße aus Berlin
~~~~~~~ Un-CDs, nein danke! http://www.heise.de/ct/cd-register/ ~~~~~~~
~ Help Microsoft fight software piracy: Give Linux to a friend today! ~

Reply With Quote

Steven Fisher

Posts: n/a

Re: Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 05-25-2004, 11:27 AM

In article <20040525065213.0370eab8.henryk.nospamplease@ploet zli.ch>,
Henryk Plötz <henryk.nospamplease@ploetzli.ch> wrote:

> Probably no. Current webcams tend to have problems with USB's bandwidth
> (up to 12 MBit/s) and thus need compression. Bluetooth supports only up
> to 723 kBit/s (per piconet).

Is Bluetooth as fast as it will ever be, then? Is there no reason to
except a Bluetooth 2 or such?

--
Steven Fisher; sdfisher@spamcop.net
"Morituri Nolumus Mori."

Reply With Quote

~ Q ~

Posts: n/a

Re: Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 05-26-2004, 10:58 PM

Steven Fisher - typed:
> In article <20040525065213.0370eab8.henryk.nospamplease@ploet zli.ch>,
> Henryk Plötz <henryk.nospamplease@ploetzli.ch> wrote:
>
>> Probably no. Current webcams tend to have problems with USB's
>> bandwidth (up to 12 MBit/s) and thus need compression. Bluetooth
>> supports only up to 723 kBit/s (per piconet).
>
> Is Bluetooth as fast as it will ever be, then? Is there no reason to
> except a Bluetooth 2 or such?

On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/
Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible info
on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but channel
bonding may do it at some point in the future.
Also:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/News_story_248.php
http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/342/C2680/
http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/cam/cam161.html

--
The map is not the territory

Reply With Quote

pzboyz

Posts: n/a

Re: Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 05-26-2004, 11:18 PM

~ Q ~ wrote:

> On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
> http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/
> Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible info
> on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but channel
> bonding may do it at some point in the future.

Bluetooth 1.2 does not give greater bandwidth.

Reply With Quote

~ Q ~

Posts: n/a

Re: Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 07-05-2004, 07:13 PM

pzboyz - typed:
> ~ Q ~ wrote:
>
>> On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
>> http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/
>> Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible
>> info on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but
>> channel bonding may do it at some point in the future.
>
> Bluetooth 1.2 does not give greater bandwidth.

But it will soon:
http://www.csr.com/enews/hw013.html
http://www.reed-electronics.com/ednm...dustryid=22043

--
The map is not the territory

Reply With Quote

Halam Rose

Posts: n/a

Re: Bluetooth Future???

Posted: 07-19-2004, 04:19 PM

1.2 enhancements are:
ESCO for better speach quality
Quicker connect - should be twice as fast
Adqaptive frequency Hopping
and Some flow control stuff in L2CAP

Cheers,
Halam Rose
BQB
7 layers UK

"~ Q ~" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2ktk1bF698h8U1@uni-berlin.de...
> pzboyz - typed:
> > ~ Q ~ wrote:
> >
> >> On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
> >> http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/
> >> Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible
> >> info on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but
> >> channel bonding may do it at some point in the future.
> >
> > Bluetooth 1.2 does not give greater bandwidth.
>
> But it will soon:
> http://www.csr.com/enews/hw013.html
> http://www.reed-electronics.com/ednm...dustryid=22043
>
> --
> The map is not the territory
>
>

Reply With Quote

Reply

« Urgent!!! Bluetooth profile implementation | Best US Cell Co for Bluetooth »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
future of bluetooth	Ilyas	Bluetooth	8	03-04-2004 03:31 PM
Future of bluetooth	Ilyas	Bluetooth	4	03-03-2004 11:41 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:46 PM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33